fbpx Skip to content
Car dashboard. Radio closeup. Woman sets up radio

NRB Supports the Local Radio Freedom Act to Preserve a Free Market in Music Licensing

The Local Radio Freedom Act (H.Con.Res.33) declares that “Congress should not impose any new performance fee, tax, royalty, or other charge relating to the public performance of sound recordings on a local radio station for broadcasting sound recordings over the air, or on any business for such public performance of sound recordings.”

With 207 cosponsors in the House as of this writing, the Local Radio Freedom Act (LRFA) is just a handful of cosponsors away from the 218 needed to constitute a majority of the House of Representatives, a threshold that demonstrates that any performance tax proposal would be dead on arrival. What would this legislation mean for NRB’s membership and the radio industry at large? Let’s unpack the facts about performance royalties and the LRFA.

Radio stations—particularly in times of emergency—provide a public service that is burdened by the application of unnecessary taxes, laws, and regulations. Local radio already abides by many costly regulations that do not apply to other platforms, such as political ad reporting requirements, ownership restrictions, public service obligations, and more.

The relationship between radio and performers has long thrived to the benefit of listeners, emerging artists, record labels, and stations. Even as streaming options abound, new and up-and-coming artists rely on local radio for promotion and exposure. Broadcasters, including many NRB members who include music in their programming day, already pay music licensing fees and provide free promotion, worth billions in music sales, to record labels and artists. A performance royalty would financially cripple local radio stations, thereby jeopardizing local jobs and depriving listeners.

In urging lawmakers to support the LRFA, broadcasters are appealing to Congress to stay out of the relationship between broadcasters and performing artists. “Without the overhang of a statutory license and government-imposed fees, a number of broadcasters and record labels have negotiated dozens of private agreements,” the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) explains. “That is how the free market is supposed to work.”

The competing bill, the American Music Fairness Act (H.R. 4130), sponsored by Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), would establish a statutory license for all terrestrial (AM/FM) radio stations, with fees set by the federal government, eliminating the possibility of market-based deals that benefit all parties. This constitutes a massive expansion of government into the music licensing space and would principally benefit the three major record labels that already dominate the music licensing market.

In June 2021, NRB CEO Troy A. Miller sent a letter to U.S. House and Senate leaders urging them to support H. Con. Res. 33 and S. Con. Res. 9, writing,

“At a time when local radio stations are recovering from the economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, imposing a new performance royalty would further devastate local radio stations already struggling to stay afloat . . . A performance royalty would financially cripple local Christian radio stations, thereby jeopardizing local jobs and harming local radio listeners.”

As NRB engages members of Congress on this legislation, we encourage our members to contact their representatives and urge them to support the LRFA, protect local broadcasters from burdensome performance royalties, and preserve a free market in music licensing.

See if your representative has cosponsored the Local Radio Freedom Act here.

Become A More Effective Christian Communicator

Get news and resources you need to become a better leader and communicator. Thousands of industry leaders and decision makers read NRB Today every Thursday — add your name to the list.

ADVERTISEMENT