HOME > NEWSROOM > ARTICLES > Whose Free Speech Is It Anyway?

Whose Free Speech Is It Anyway?

By Craig L. Parshall, Senior Vice President & General Counsel

John Milton Project for Free Speech, Craig ParshallLast week, I led a discussion at the National Press Club in Washington, DC, on the newest wave of censorship being perpetrated by Facebook, Apple, and Google against conservative and Christian viewpoints. Citizens holding those kinds of opinions are finding it more and more difficult to share them on the Internet platforms of those three media tech giants. That led to the next logical question among our panel of experts: what should we, or can we, do about it? The viewpoint discrimination practiced by those Web companies reminds me of a grade school boy who was part of our basketball group during recess. He was the proud owner of a yellow basketball that he brought to school every day. Each time we wanted to form a quick pick-up game on the playground, he would remind us that it was his basketball, and therefore he would make up the game rules. We would challenge him on that, but his answer was always the same: "Whose basketball is it, anyway?"

During the roundtable discussion sponsored last Thursday by our John Milton Project for Free Speech, we had three convincing testimonials about the phenomena of anti-conservative, anti-Christian censorship on the Web. Todd Starnes, a cultural commentator for FOX News, spoke to us about his own Facebook page. Todd tested the bounds of politically incorrect expression by posting that he was a fan of Paula Deen's cooking, a lover of Jesus-praising Gospel music, and proudly wears an NRA ball cap. Facebook shut his page down.

Gov. Mike Huckabee joined our discussion through a video message. He described how last year, during the Chick-fil-A controversy over same-sex marriage, he posted an invitation on his Facebook page for Americans who agreed with the traditional marriage position of Chick-fil-A's CEO, to show their support by frequenting that fast-food chain on a special appreciation day. Facebook shut him down too for some 12 hours, until millions of outraged citizens protested and Facebook relented.

Then there is the Manhattan Declaration – founded in part by the late Chuck Colson – an online statement of basic Christian conscience in matters of marriage, sanctity of life, and religious freedom. At our panel discussion, Eric Teetsel, who Colson hand-picked to run the project shortly before his death, described how the Declaration was approved by Apple and made available on its iTunes App Store for use on all iPhones. But when a cadre of gay rights activists protested, Apple removed the Declaration's iPhone app from its store without warning or notice.

During our Press Club discussion I shared our recent report, The Future of Free Speech, Freedom of Religion, and Free Press on Facebook, Google, Apple, etc. - a Current Assessment, where I also listed plenty of similar incidents of censorship by Google as well. Of course, we also heard words of caution from our other panelists – Adam Thierer, a respected media technology expert at George Mason University, and Trevor Burrus, a constitutional law pundit at the Cato Institute. They both reminded us that Facebook, Google, and Apple are private companies, and that the First Amendment does not constrain them legally. As private companies, they have the power to commit as much viewpoint censorship as they want. Beyond that, they indicated that those enterprises should enjoy the fruits of free enterprise, including the right to pursue their own policies that allow certain lawful opinions, but not others. Which brings us full-circle: what can, or should, be done about this shocking denial of – if not the "rights" of free speech, then certainly – the value of citizen free speech on Facebook, Google, and Apple?

As grade schoolers, my pals and I finally convinced the owner of the yellow basketball that he may own the ball, but the rest of us are necessary if the game is to be played. Yes, Facebook and their fellow Web Goliaths may own the right to control their social networking site, their Web innovations, and their iPhone systems. But without the messages, ideas, and opinions of ordinary citizens being posted, emailed, and shared on their sites, their companies couldn't exist. Whose "yellow basketball" is it? It is clearly theirs. But whose free speech is it, anyway? That, I would suggest, is ours.     

 

By Craig Parshall
Senior Vice President & General Counsel, National Religious Broadcasters
Director, John Milton Project for Free Speech     

Click here to read more articles written by Craig Parshall.

JMP

PHOTO ABOVE: Gov. Mike Huckabee shares via video his experience of having his pro-traditional marriage Facebook page taken down during the Chick-fil-A debate last year as event participants watch and listen. Up front, from left to right, are Todd Starnes, Host of FOX News & Commentary; Eric Teetsel, Executive Director of the Manhattan Declaration; Craig Parshall, Senior Vice President & General Counsel at NRB and Director of the John Milton Project; Adam Thierer, Senior Research Fellow with the Technology Policy Program at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University; and Trevor Burrus, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute’s Center for Constitutional Studies.

Published: October 10, 2013

Latest News

Thousands of Churches to Join ‘Stand for Marriage Sunday’ on April 26

Thousands of churches will join “Stand for Marriage Sunday” on April 26 – just two days before the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments on the definition of marriage.

House Panel to Review FCC Transparency Proposals

Congressman Greg Walden (R-OR), Chairman of the House Communications and Technology Subcommittee, has scheduled a hearing next Thursday on “FCC Reauthorization: Improving Commission Transparency.”

Nagmeh Abedini Calls for Husband’s Release From Iran

The wife of Pastor Saeed Abedini has written an open letter to President Barack Obama urging the release of her husband, an American citizen imprisoned for his faith in Iran.

Bill Would Link Performance Tax and Television Law

Representatives Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Anna Eshoo (D-CA) this week reintroduced legislation that would tie the issues of television retransmission consent and a radio performance tax with a new FM chip twist.

Franklin Graham Announces 50-State ‘Decision America Tour’ in 2016

Franklin Graham plans to embark on a 50-state tour of the U.S. in 2016 to hold prayer rallies, to share the message of Jesus, and to challenge Christians to boldly live out their faith.

Pure Flix to Release 'Faith Of Our Fathers' as U.S. Commemorates 50th Anniversary of Vietnam War

Faith Of Our Fathers – a moving story of faith and friendship in time of war – premieres nationwide July 1 as the nation commemorates the 50th anniversary of the Vietnam War.

CBN News to Bring House Speaker, Pro-Life Advocate, and Super Bowl Hero to White House Correspondents’ Dinner

CBN News will be bringing Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, pro-life advocate Lila Rose, and New England Patriots cornerback Malcolm Butler as their guests to the 2015 White House Correspondents’ Dinner that will be held in Washington, DC, on Saturday, April 25.

NRB Opposes New Performance Tax Bill

Representatives Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) this week introduced the latest iteration of performance tax legislation in the so-called Fair Play Fair Pay Act (H. R. 1733).

FCC Chairman Calls for AM Radio Rules Update

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler penned a blog post this week indicating his interest in advancing the agency’s “Revitalization of the AM Radio Service” proceeding (MB Docket No. 13-249)...

Free Speech Amicus Brief Filed on Behalf of NRB, Others in Supreme Court Marriage Case

On behalf of NRB and other prominent religious organizations and leaders, Liberty Institute filed an amicus brief last week in the historic U.S. Supreme Court case, Obergefell v. Hodges, which could determine the future of marriage laws in the United States.

More News