HOME > NEWSROOM > ARTICLES > The Marriage Penalty

The Marriage Penalty

Penalty FlagDuring the arguments before the Supreme Court over same-sex marriage last week, it struck me that what may end up mattering most in the dispute in these two cases over gay unions was addressed the least. The real issue for people who hold a Christian worldview may well be the extreme lengths to which they could be penalized if the High Court gets it wrong. The audacity of the arguments to legitimize homosexual marriage, and the apparent receptivity of Justices Ginsberg, Sotomayor, Kagan and Breyer, is an example of the federalization of American culture – the ever-expanding grasp of secular federal power over issues that historically have belonged to the states and to their citizens. Implied in this debate also is the privatization of religious expression and rights of conscience – the drastic shrinking of that sphere within which people of faith are allowed to express and live out their beliefs. In fact, I would suggest a corollary here: as federalization increases, religious liberty decreases.

In the Proposition 8 case, lower court federal judges vetoed the popular ballot initiative of the people of California who overwhelmingly supported a traditional definition of marriage in their state. “Marriage,” like the concept of “family,” has, up to now, been defined by states as an institution whose definition and purpose were passed down through the religiously-rooted common law. Thirty states have amended their constitutions to reflect traditional marriage as the norm. Recently, though, federal judges in California have minted a supposed new right under the federal Constitution that voids the values and decisions of citizens on this issue. In the other case, one that involves DOMA – the Defense of Marriage Act – unelected federal judges struck down a law passed by elected members of Congress and signed by President Clinton that defined marriage traditionally for federal law purposes. This problematic federalization impulse is not just a function of the judiciary, but appears to occasionally spring from all three branches: while Obamacare was White House-engineered, it was also congressionally-authorized, and Supreme Court-affirmed. Further, the HHS mandate will, unless overturned, force religious employers to either violate their consciences by providing coverage for abortion-inducing drugs to employees and their families, or to pay exorbitant fines that could bankrupt them. 

In the same way, an extreme federalization approach by the Supreme Court in either or both of the Prop. 8 and DOMA cases could result in the further privatization of religious expression and free speech. Nine times during the oral argument in the DOMA case, the word “animus” appeared, a legal term that in common parlance indicates hatred or ill will; in the context of that case, government lawyers have argued that Congress was guilty of expressing “animus” against gays in even passing DOMA in the first place. Justice Elena Kagan was relentless in questioning the attorney supporting DOMA, as she seemed to express disapproval that some members of those House of Representatives opposed gay marriage as “immoral.” In the Prop. 8 case, the gay rights lawyers argued in their written brief that any condemnation of homosexuality “as immoral” constitutes official “discrimination.” One federal court has already censored a high school student who labeled homosexuality as “shameful,” and there are now signs that our Department of Justice and federal judges may enforce the new federal hate crimes law, which was lobbied effectively by gay activists, in ways that ignore rights of religious expression and belief. If the Supreme Court stumbles in deciding the marriage cases, we could see a Canadian-type legal culture emerge; in February, the Canadian Supreme Court affirmed the punishment of a man for publishing pamphlets that called for citizens to “keep homosexuality” “out of the public schools.” That Court, in upholding provisions of a hate speech law, did not seem bothered by the fact that it was censoring a pamphlet that also included a call for homosexuals to “be redeemed if they repent and ask Jesus Christ to come into their lives as Lord and Savior.” None of this should evoke fear. But it should increase our vigilance, as we heed the advice of the Apostle Paul in Ephesians, chapter 5 – to “awake, sleeper,” and to be careful to “walk, not as unwise, but as wise, making the most of your time, because the days are evil.”   

By Craig Parshall
Senior Vice President & General Counsel, National Religious Broadcasters
Director, John Milton Project for Free Speech     

Click here to read more articles written by Craig Parshall.

Published: April 4, 2013

Latest News

National Religious Broadcasters Marks 70th Anniversary

This year marks the 70th anniversary of the National Religious Broadcasters, which was established with the focus of defending and expanding access to electronic media platforms for the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

FCC Chairman Engages on Future of Broadcasting

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Tom Wheeler offered his thoughts this week on what the future of broadcasting could...

Supreme Court Turns Down First Amendment Case

The U.S. Supreme Court this week decided not to take up Elane Photography v. Willock, a case in which a professional photographer...

Nearly Half of House Publicly Oppose Performance Tax

Nearly half of all Members of Congress in the U.S. House of Representatives now publicly support the Local Radio Freedom Act...

NRB Chairman Bill Blount Meets, Greets NAB Leaders

Newly elected NRB Chairman Bill Blount had the opportunity this week to meet and speak briefly with the President and CEO of the National Association of Broadcasters as well as its Chairman.

Cornerstone Network Celebrates 35 Years of Broadcasting

Cornerstone Network will mark its 35th anniversary on Tuesday, April 15, and plans to celebrate its history and future with an array of activities, including an on-air celebration, the release of a new book, and the launch of new television programs.

Irreplaceable: Focus on the Family's First-Ever Movie Event on May 6

Irreplaceable, one of the largest initiatives that Focus on the Family has ever undertaken, will be presented one night only in more than 700 select movie theaters around the country.

In Memoriam: Norma Pederson, Wife of Reach Beyond President Wayne Pederson

Norma Pederson, the wife of Reach Beyond President Wayne Pederson, passed away Thursday, April 3, after a yearlong battle with cancer.

Walking with the Enemy: Mark Schmidt Adapts True Decades-Old Story from Nazi-Occupied Hungary

Last week, the Rev. Mark Jenkins, NRB President's Council Member and Minister of Media at Grove Avenue Baptist Church in Richmond, VA, invited several NRB staff to attend a screening of Director Mark Schmidt's Walking with the Enemy, produced by Liberty Studios.

CIN Study Highlighted at Senate Hearing

Following up on a hearing by the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, members of the Senate Commerce Committee began their review of the...

More News