HOME > NEWSROOM > ARTICLES > Religious Rights on the Razor’s Edge

Religious Rights on the Razor’s Edge

Razor's EdgeJudges, like most of us, prefer to resolve matters on the basis of simple issues rather than complex ones. Part of that is due to the need for judicial economy. But it may also be due to an application of “Ockham’s razor,” the concept minted in the 14th century by theorist William of Ockham. He postulated that, between two explanations – one complicated and one simple – the latter is most likely to be the better one. As I reviewed the arguments made before the Supreme Court last week in the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties cases, I counted no less than 11 important legal issues that haunt this case. Einstein restated Ockham’s theory this way: “Everything should be made as simple as possible ….” In an effort to satisfy both of these geniuses, I have come up with three “simple” reasons why the religious rights of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga, both of them closely-held, family-owned, for-profit, faith-based companies, ought to prevail over the federal HHS mandate that would force them to provide their employees with insurance coverage that includes abortion-inducing drugs.

First, the federal law protecting those companies, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), was passed by Congress with the clear understanding that it would protect religious persons from having to provide, or support, objectionable services intended to terminate pregnancies. As we pointed out in our brief to the Supreme Court, even Nadine Strossen, the past President of the ACLU, testified in Congress in support of RFRA, and predicted confidently that the law “will enhance the rights of those who conscientiously and religiously are opposed to abortion ….” While much has been made of the fact that both companies are for-profit corporations, there is nothing in the text of RFRA that would exclude them from its protections. Further, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who seemed otherwise hostile to the claims of the two companies, had to admit in open court that they nevertheless make “great plaintiffs,” which I take to mean that they present an attractive illustration why some for-profit, faith-based employers might be entitled to the same religious rights that churches and private citizens enjoy.

Second, there is (in the words of RFRA) a substantial “burden” on the religious rights of those companies by virtue of the massive penalties they would have to pay under Obamacare to avoid violating their religious beliefs. Suggestions by a few of the justices that the financial bottom line of the companies would be unaffected ignores economic realities and renders that conclusion “absurd,” as Justice Antonin Scalia put it during oral argument.

Third, the religious rights of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga clearly outweigh any governmental interest in forcing faith-based companies to collaborate with the termination of pre-born life. The argument that such compulsion does not collide with religious liberty is not only audacious, it is breathtaking. During the arguments in the Roe v. Wade case, then-Justice Potter Stewart wondered out loud whether the abortion question itself was, essentially, a “religious question.” Eight times in the Roe v. Wade opinion, the Court referred to religious issues and in no less than 10 court decisions in the years that followed, the Supreme Court justices mentioned the religious aspects of intentionally ending pre-born life.

During the arguments last week, Justice Anthony Kennedy, a key swing vote, seemed conflicted. He appeared concerned that the “rights” of the employees of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga to access the controversial federally-mandated insurance coverage would be impaired; yet he also seemed equally perplexed that the government’s position, if upheld, could ultimately lead to private citizens, private medical practitioners, and private employers being forced by Washington to provide abortions for others, regardless of religious conscience. Some of the justices asked about potential harm to employee “rights,” and to the rights of the public to obtain insured coverage for those medical procedures, like vaccinations, that are deemed objectionable by certain faith groups. Yet that approach strikes me as falling far short of a “compelling” government interest sufficient under RFRA to defeat the rights of these two companies, particularly because, in the decades since the passage of RFRA, this “parade of horribles” envisioned by the government lawyers has yet to ever materialize.

Will the Court adopt this kind of “Ockham’s razor” approach, simplifying this complex case, and correctly upholding the religious freedoms of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga? Sadly, that is hard to say. After all, predicting Supreme Court cases is, in the end, a complicated rather than a simple business.

By Craig Parshall
Senior Vice President & General Counsel, National Religious Broadcasters
Director, John Milton Project for Free Speech    

Click here to read more articles written by Craig Parshall.

Published: April 3, 2014

Latest News

NRB Spearheads ‘Get Out the Vote’ PSA Campaign

NRB has initiated a “Get Out the Vote” campaign to encourage Christians across America to cast their votes in the upcoming election, which could prove to be one of the most crucial in our nation’s history.

Joni Eareckson Tada Presented with the First True Woman Award

Joni Eareckson Tada, Founder and CEO of Joni and Friends, received a special honor earlier this month at the True Woman 2014 National Women's Conference.

In Memoriam: Herb Jacobson, Reach Beyond's Longest Serving Missionary

Just a few months after surpassing 65 years of service with Reach Beyond (formerly HCJB Global) and just three days after celebrating his 89th birthday, missionary engineer Herb Jacobson went to be with the Lord on Wednesday, October 8.

NRB Board Member Jay Flowers Now Managing Director at Grace to You Ministry

Jay Flowers, who serves on the NRB Board of Directors, the NRB President’s Council, and Pastor John MacArthur’s Grace to You ministry, has been named Managing Director at Grace to You.

NRB Concerned by Call for Hate Speech Proceeding

A petition to the FCC challenging a broadcaster license alleges “hate speech” and calls for a FCC hearing on the subject. Dr. Jerry A. Johnson, President & CEO of NRB, wrote to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to...

City of Houston Subpoenas Sermons

NRB and many others were alarmed this week by the City of Houston’s subpoena of local pastors’ church sermons. “This inquisition by the City of Houston is unconstitutional,” declared Dr. Jerry A. Johnson, President & CEO of NRB.

Thousands Gather to Pray for Washington

On Columbus Day, I was pleased to gather with thousands of Christians from churches around the Washington, DC area to pray for this capital city.

FCC Calls for Input on LPTV

The FCC recently declared that it is suspending deadlines for construction of new digital low power television (LPTV) stations, and similarly stated its intent to postpone the 2015 deadline for...

NRB to Debut Film & Entertainment Summit in 2015

NRB is launching the Film & Entertainment Summit at the NRB 2015 International Christian Media Convention in Nashville, TN.

Don't Miss Early Bird Rates for the NRB15 Int’l Christian Media Convention!

Registration is open for the NRB 2015 International Christian Media Convention, to be held February 23-26, 2015, in Nashville, TN. But to take advantage of the Early Bird Registration discounts and save up to $200, you’ll need to register by November 15, 2014.

More News