HOME > NEWSROOM > ARTICLES > Hate by Another Name

Hate by Another Name

Free SpeechThis week, I was perusing a Facebook page authored by former adherents to Islam who decided to leave it and who are now following Jesus. As I did, I couldn't help but think about statements made recently by a Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutor who suggested that postings against the Muslim community on social networking sites could constitute a civil rights crime. The statements were made by Bill Killian, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, who had been interviewed in anticipation of Tuesday's public meeting in that state where he was to address what he called the "consequences" under federal law for certain anti-Islamic expression. At the public meeting, the DOJ lawyer described the criminal cases he has already brought and will continue to bring under the federal hate crimes law for "acts against the Arab-Muslim" community.

All of this has ignited a significant debate over the First Amendment and adds to the mounting evidence that the DOJ views so-called "hate speech" on certain issues – particularly negative comments about Islam or homosexuality, for example – as a potential civil rights crime.

This is a shockingly dismal view of free speech, particularly coming from America's chief federal law enforcers. But this trend may be explained, in part, by the special deference that the DOJ has granted to Muslim and gay rights groups in particular. Both of those groups were prime lobbyists, along with the Obama Administration, for the passage of the federal hate crimes law.  Furthermore, over the last few years, Justice Department officials have been tasked to conduct an unprecedented public relations campaign with Muslim organizations, such as the one that co-sponsored Tuesday's event in Tennessee. And when ENDA (the Employment Non-Discrimination Act), a gay rights bill, came up in the Senate, Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez testified in strong support and decried what he has described as a history of discrimination against homosexuals in the workplace. I testified at that same hearing, pointing out how ENDA would violate the constitutional rights of Christian employers – a concern that was not shared by the DOJ. When Mr. Perez appeared before another congressional committee in July 2012, Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) asked him point-blank whether he or his DOJ associates would ever entertain "criminalizing speech" if it is directed against a particular religion. Perez refused to discount that possibility.

Here at NRB, we have been warning the public for years about the way in which hate crimes laws can be used to suppress particular kinds of legitimate free speech. There has been a disturbing shift among some policymakers in Washington and the government lawyers who work for them – one that evidences a low view of historic liberties and a high-handed view that the Bill of Rights may have to give way to shifting social and political needs. But this debate takes on a very personal face when one reads the posts on Facebook from ex-Muslims who are now Christians, such as the ones I came across this week. On the Facebook page I visited, the authors were clearly referring to the threat of violence that faces Jesus followers who leave Islam, likening those threats to what the Bible says about the devil, who is "like a roaring lion" (I Peter 5:8). The Facebook user's posting was cleverly comparing Islamic attempts at intimidation of Christians to the tactics of the Evil One, who tries to "frighten the children of God with his mighty roar."

So we must ask: Would such statements now be a crime under this new, diminished view of the First Amendment? Would the DOJ consider that posting to be a "hate crime"?

At the end of that Facebook post, the writer ends the analogy between violent Islam and the strategies of Satan by asking the readers: "Got it?" Another post below it, clearly from another ex-Muslim who is now a Jesus follower, replies this way: "Got it." 

The Gospel message of God's saving grace is too precious a commodity to be bartered away in exchange for the new brand of anti-free speech political correctness. Those who follow Christ are not haters; they follow a Redeemer who is both Truth and Love, and Who commands us to embody both at all costs, to exercise our liberty to do so, and, I believe, to fight for that right as long as it is still day.

"Got it?"

 By Craig Parshall
Senior Vice President & General Counsel, National Religious Broadcasters
Director, John Milton Project for Free Speech     

Click here to read more articles written by Craig Parshall.

Published: June 6, 2013

Latest News

NRB President & CEO Dr. Jerry A. Johnson to Participate in Values Voter Summit 2014

Dr. Jerry A. Johnson, President & CEO of NRB, will lead a powerful dialogue about recent attacks to our freedoms of religion and speech during next month’s Values Voter Summit in Washington, DC.

Hope for Hurting Hearts Continues to Touch Lives and Win Awards

Hope for Hurting Hearts, a documentary film produced by Harvest Ministries with Greg Laurie, recently added another distinction to its running list of awards and accolades – this time for Best Editing from the Pan Pacific Film Festival.

Pure Flix's God's Not Dead Tops Home Video Sales Charts

God’s Not Dead, a film from NRB member Pure Flix Entertainment, debuted earlier this month at No. 1 on the Nielsen Christian Videos sales chart and No. 2 on the Nielsen VideoScan First Alert sales chart, which tracks overall Blu-ray and DVD combined sales.

Do You Want to Highlight Your Organization in NRB Today - For Free?

We are soliciting descriptions about NRB members to feature in our weekly e-newsletter, NRB Today, and on the NRB website. If you are a member of NRB and are interested in being featured ...

NRBMLC Files Comments to DOJ on ASCAP and BMI Consent Decrees

The NRB Music License Committee (NRBMLC) filed comments with the U.S. Department of Justice last week in response to its plans to review the “consent decrees” that govern how the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) and Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) license songs for public performance in the United States.

National Radio Day: A Look Back at the Early Days of Christian Broadcasting

When radio emerged as a public medium in the early 1920s, preachers were fascinated but cautious.

Christian Advocacy Group Protests Offensive Cartoon Network Program

The Christian Film & Television Commission® (CFTVC), an advocacy group promoting quality Christian entertainment, is organizing a protest against Black Jesus, the Cartoon Network’s new controversial program.

CBN’s Superbook Partners with Newton Media

Newton Media has been selected to partner with CBN’s Superbook to brand market their award-winning animated Bible series and build their continuity program via DRTV, barter syndication, and digital platforms.

4 FEBC Volunteers Martyred in Ukraine

Four young FEBC volunteers who were recently captured by pro-Russian separatists in Eastern Ukraine were brutally beaten to death simply for being Christians, according to a report from the organization last week.

Answers in Genesis: Ark Encounter Will Not Be Built with State Funds

Answers in Genesis, the apologetics ministry of Ken Ham, is working to make it clear that the full-scale Noah’s Ark that it plans to build in Williamstown, KY, will not be constructed with state funds.

More News